Re: [foxboro] PIDTAU & PID Tuning.
- From: <MUGARTET@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 13:20:16 -0300
Rick,
In our case, with MODOPT 5 we had a SPLLAG of 1 to have a good initial =
response in the output to STP changes. To our surprise, the SPLLAG =
parameter disappeared when changed MODOPT to 8, and seemed to have no =
effect since the response was as if we had SPLLAG 0. As regards the lack =
of response to the sustained error, the INT value was 3 (not too large =
considering it is a temperature control of a fired heater). As regards =
the derivative, we used KD to damp the noise in the MEAS, so that =
shouldn't be bothering. We did not try the FBTUNE, but can do it to =
improve the tuning once we are sure it works fine.
The other concern is whether the tuning parameters should be changed =
given the fact that the algorithm for MODOPT 8 is non-interactive vs. =
product of factors for MODOPT 5. If that's the case, does anyone have =
the conversion table?
Regards,
Martin
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Rick Rys [mailto:rys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Enviado el: Jueves, 29 de Mayo de 2003 11:06
Para: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Asunto: Re: [foxboro] PIDTAU & PID Tuning.
While I haven't messed with the PIDTAU in a few years, I do recall that =
it
worked as expected. Regarding the movement in output when the SPT is
changed, this is governed by the SPLLAG parameter and also by the PB. =
For
fast response to SPT changes there is an optimal value for SPLLAG. If =
set
to 0.0 (No output bump) then changes to SPT will be much slower (Longer =
time
for MEAS to reach SPT) and the output will only change at the reset rate
(Integral tuning parameter). Regarding the lack of output response with =
a
sustained error, this should not occur (i.e. Somethings wrong) as the
MODOPT=3D8 has P+I+D and the integral should eventually return the MEAS =
to
SPT. Maybe you set the I to a very large value?, Maybe noise in the =
MEAS is
being acted on with the Derivative. You can set the D to zero. Also =
the
PIDTAU can be tuned with the FBTUNE block and the pretune function =
(bi-polar
pulse) usually gets the tuning values very close.
Regarding the managment of PID tuning in general there are some third =
party
packages out there that can keep track of/manage tuning settings. You =
can
find these in google by searching "PID tuning".
Rick Rys
=20
=20
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
=20
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: =
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
to unsubscribe: =
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
=20
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts: