Re: [foxboro] P91 and remote clients
- From: "Dumitru, Alex" <alex.dumitru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 09:34:26 -0400
#1 Any client connection to the Terminal Services requires a TS-CAL. The
Remote Desktop Web Connection (used when connecting through the Internet
Explorer) is actually an ActiveX control that ends up communicating with
the Terminal Server and acquiring a TS-CAL.
A good overview of the TS architecture and interactions can be found on
MS TechNet at "How Terminal Service Work"
http://technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver/en/library/2cb5c8c9-cadc-44a
9-bf39-856127f4c8271033.mspx?mfr=3Dtrue
#2 All cases listed by you need one CAL + one TS Device CAL
See details at Terminal Server Licensing Requirements
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/howtobuy/licensing/ts2003.msp
x
Excerpt follows:
"Windows Server License
The Windows Server 2003 R2 licensing model requires a server license for
each copy of the server software installed. Terminal Services
functionality is included in the Windows Server license.
Windows Server Client Access License
In addition to a server license, a Windows Server Client Access License
(CAL) is required. If you wish to conduct a Windows session, an
incremental Terminal Server Client Access License (TS CAL) is required
as well. A Windows session is defined as a session during which the
server software hosts a graphical user interface on a device. For
Windows sessions, a TS CAL is required for each user or device.
Device-based versus User-based Terminal Server CALs
Two types of Terminal Server Client Access Licenses are available: TS
Device CAL or TS User CAL.
* A TS Device CAL permits one device (used by any user) to conduct
Windows Sessions on any of your servers.
* A TS User CAL permits one user (using any device) to conduct Windows
Sessions on any of your servers.
You may choose to use a combination of TS Device CALs and TS User CALs
simultaneously with the server software."
Regards,
Alex Dumitru, Eng.
SI & IT
Invensys Systems Canada Inc.
Phone: (514) 421 8073
Fax: (514) 421 8054
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of tom.vandewater@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 8:48 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] P91 and remote clients
Alex or Russ,
I'm very interested in hearing a definitive answer to Ron's question.
He said:
Case #1: My understanding was that the remote Foxview using Internet
Explorer was connecting using TCP port 8080 and Internet Information
Services (IIS).(Web Server) This type of connection didn't need the
TS-Cal.
Is that a true statement?
He also said:
Case #2: When you connect with remote desktop connection (Formerly
Terminal Service Client on the NT system) you do require TS-Cals for
each machine(per device) or each user (per-seat).
From my reading of the excerpts included below from the article Russ
forwarded I came to this understanding. It is confusing so I could be
wrong.
One user on one client machine would require two licenses:
1 Device CAL
1 User CAL
Two users on one client machine would require 3 licenses:
1 Device CAL
2 User CAL's
Ten users on one client machine would require 11 licenses:
1 Device CAL
10 User CAL's
Does everyone agree with that assumption?
Tom VandeWater
Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachment(s) =
to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the recipient(s) and =
may contain confidential, privileged or proprietary information. If you are=
not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, delete a=
ll copies of this message and any attachment(s). Any other use of the E-Mai=
l by you is prohibited.
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] P91 and remote clients
- From: Ron Schafer
- Re: [foxboro] P91 and remote clients
- From: tom.vandewater
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] P91 and remote clients
- » Re: [foxboro] P91 and remote clients
- » Re: [foxboro] P91 and remote clients
- » Re: [foxboro] P91 and remote clients
- » Re: [foxboro] P91 and remote clients
- » Re: [foxboro] P91 and remote clients
- » Re: [foxboro] P91 and remote clients
- » Re: [foxboro] P91 and remote clients
- » Re: [foxboro] P91 and remote clients
- » Re: [foxboro] P91 and remote clients
- » Re: [foxboro] P91 and remote clients
- » Re: [foxboro] P91 and remote clients
- » Re: [foxboro] P91 and remote clients
- Re: [foxboro] P91 and remote clients
- From: Ron Schafer
- Re: [foxboro] P91 and remote clients
- From: tom.vandewater