Re: [foxboro] Operator interface question
- From: stan <stanb@xxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 10:41:47 -0400
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 08:43:44AM -0500, Corey R Clingo wrote:
>
>
> One characteristic of most DCS PLC gateways is that the output values are
> silently read back behind the scenes so the operator is able to see exactly
> what is in that PLC. This causes confusion sometimes (i.e., when operator
> actions have no effect because the PLC logic obliterated their change), but
> is a reflection of the real world, and helps in situations like this. I
> believe the Integrator 30 at least behaves in this manner.
>
I think I'm begning to gat a picture of how this should work.
However I still have a rather basic question. How can I read a value from
the PLC, and increment/decrement this value to write it back? If the AIN in
the gateway is in auto, I can't change the value in the DCS, right? If
instead, i make a copy, modify it, and write that back to the PLC, which
then detects the new data, and sends it back to the AIN, that I am
modifying, don't I have a timing race?
--
"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] Operator interface question
- From: Corey R Clingo
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] Operator interface question
- » Re: [foxboro] Operator interface question
- » Re: [foxboro] Operator interface question
- » Re: [foxboro] Operator interface question
- » Re: [foxboro] Operator interface question
- » Re: [foxboro] Operator interface question
- » Re: [foxboro] Operator interface question
- » Re: [foxboro] Operator interface question
- » Re: [foxboro] Operator interface question
- » Re: [foxboro] Operator interface question
- » Re: [foxboro] Operator interface question
- » Re: [foxboro] Operator interface question
- » Re: [foxboro] Operator interface question
- » Re: [foxboro] Operator interface question
- Re: [foxboro] Operator interface question
- From: Corey R Clingo