Re: [foxboro] Open loop alarm

"...the end suer..."

Well, I don't think it has come to that yet, but dealing with another 
200-series fieldbus problem here over the last two days makes me want to 
call my lawyer :)


Corey




stan <stanb@xxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
11/29/2005 09:08 AM
Please respond to
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


To
brad.s.wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject
Re: [foxboro] Open loop alarm






On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 07:44:16AM -0600, brad.s.wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
wrote:
> Shouldn't it be possible to wire the AOUT signal back into a AIN point 
in
> series with the field device ?
> Clearly, you wouldn't want to do this with ALL your AOUTs, but for 
critical
> ones ... perhaps.
>

Yes, but that turns it into yet another implementation detail to be 
handled
by the end suer/designer/integrator.

It would seem like a nice thing to have in (future) FBM's to me.

--
U.S. Encouraged by Vietnam Vote - Officials Cite 83% Turnout Despite 
Vietcong Terror
- New York Times 9/3/1967





 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave

Other related posts: