Re: [foxboro] Open loop alarm
- From: stan <stanb@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: brad.s.wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:08:59 -0500
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 07:44:16AM -0600, brad.s.wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Shouldn't it be possible to wire the AOUT signal back into a AIN point in
> series with the field device ?
> Clearly, you wouldn't want to do this with ALL your AOUTs, but for critical
> ones ... perhaps.
>
Yes, but that turns it into yet another implementation detail to be handled
by the end suer/designer/integrator.
It would seem like a nice thing to have in (future) FBM's to me.
--
U.S. Encouraged by Vietnam Vote - Officials Cite 83% Turnout Despite Vietcong
Terror
- New York Times 9/3/1967
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] Open loop alarm
- From: Corey R Clingo
- References:
- [foxboro] Open loop alarm
- From: Perez, Claudio
- Re: [foxboro] Open loop alarm
- From: brad . s . wilson
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] Open loop alarm
- » Re: [foxboro] Open loop alarm
- » Re: [foxboro] Open loop alarm
- » Re: [foxboro] Open loop alarm
- » Re: [foxboro] Open loop alarm
- » Re: [foxboro] Open loop alarm
- » Re: [foxboro] Open loop alarm
- Re: [foxboro] Open loop alarm
- From: Corey R Clingo
- [foxboro] Open loop alarm
- From: Perez, Claudio
- Re: [foxboro] Open loop alarm
- From: brad . s . wilson