Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- From: Sascha Wildner <swildner@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:17:49 +0200
Johnson, Alex P (IPS) schrieb:
> • External OM variable references, e.g., :C:B.P when the compound is in a
> different CP, suspend the block for one full block period. Thus, 20
> lines setting values will take 10s to execute if the PERIOD is 0.5s.
As far as I remember, they not only suspend the block only but actually
all sequence blocks in the same CP (compound?). At least I've seen that
for references that don't resolve. For as long the block was searching
(before it error'd), no other sequence block would process external
references.
Regards,
--
Sascha Wildner
erpicon Software Development GmbH
Neusser Str. 724-726
50737 Köln
Germany
Phone: +49 221 9746089
Fax: +49 221 9746099
Mobile: +49 174 9887655
eMail: swildner@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- From: Corey R Clingo
- Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- From: Duc M Do
- Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- From: Johnson, Alex P (IPS)
- Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- From: Johnson, Alex P (IPS)
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- » Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- » Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- » Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- » Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- » Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- » Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- » Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- » Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- » Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- From: Corey R Clingo
- Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- From: Duc M Do
- Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- From: Johnson, Alex P (IPS)
- Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- From: Johnson, Alex P (IPS)