Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- From: "Johnson, Alex P (IPS)" <alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 21:36:25 -0400
"Øhºm¶¬Â?¥u·???¶)?¶?Þ¾'°?(¦¦W¦z{Z¶*'?è?zX§zÏÓ?êÞj·?}ì+ºW¬¶¢w¬??¥uú%??0?éÝzÈ ?)àiÊ'¶º%³+-zoÿÿðè?اè.?«h¯'(?Úè?¹hrKÿþj,µçß?È??ßåy«-¦º'zÚ)®?åzkÿÿÿÈ~Ø^è.?«h¯'(?Úè?¹hrKjÿþ×h?ßî±æ?,ܡע²º.?r¶¬jg¥¡§Z±©À
Öå¡Éÿ^®v¥8ËÚ®&??êÞ}êÞ?ǬýïàÿÿÂüϧ¶?¢jhºwb²)Úv'ßz·§´#ÿ²ë)zwm?æå¡É¢º'yû¥?¹hrJ^®*ý8n³ý´?)޲Ƕ)ཀྵnzÌ"?[Z?ít²ÚÅç.µè?¶?+4ÿ?ÿ"{^®v¥nZ?·?z·§që¢í²ë)zwm?æå¡Éÿnëm?ì?ë%£«¶§Ê?¦?m{^rÖ§w¥?¯y©â???¶?ò¢êå¡§b??Ê?¡j÷??? ??í?éÿEé??·«¶r?^®éìº{b?+a?ÛXý`MCS
¿ÄÆ×«?©Qy÷«zwþ?Á<$?2++y§!yßÑzg¦mêí?«b*.v?ÿ¶Z(§*.r?^m§$¶?azÚ)ÿ'¬ÿ?¡?Lïÿ?Ü"?ZÞiÈm?ç§v?í?æå¡É?Û-¢?Ñzg¦mêí?«@
2©Ý0
®²Öè¶Þ±ëm¢Úîyú+¶???$¶?î?ÿÿÿÿή("?©LzË?ïÿÿÿÅ®?ÿ~?[¢ºÿn?§qïßç¥?Ëlþ?à¢vÞ?©_¡ðîpÀèIéíý8n÷ý¹ÿm4ó¿õØó£÷èź+£÷ëyéb²Ûÿ¢¸¹¸ÞrßÑ{ÿߣè®?Î?â
¹hrJ^Ê&¦?§wÿì¶)e¶»?üéÓ?ïÒz?^?·«Û?öÓO;ÿoi?ð¨ì?
X§??+¢×ÿüâÿ"h ?ÖÞ¶êç?x"?Ú?rÁ-ÊÚrH^ißÿïìv?޲ש¢÷«¶?ayÖ«?È?{ÿÈ?ëޮưj|¦z{b¢z¶µü?Cþ?«ýÊ&¦?§v·¬¶¸?¶*'#ûÞþ?×è©e¶¬{'?®ÏÚ?Û(#
'uêâ~ØZ¶X¦?ج²Ø¥?úÞj_Èþ÷§z÷«?æ«v?í?«e?hü ÝÁèZ½é??/æj|¢?ËZ?Ǭ¡ù®?Ø©?â
¹hrK"?§(??.?ß¡×?Á¬ÿ:w?)à#÷\jëb¢|¨»öÞ?Ûajܨ¹ªÞjw¨¦y«G,ÿN?yö®?ÐO
$Ì?ÏÈ!ÿ×Mÿ!ü¨¹Ú'þ×!jx¶uçÚº[m¢Ê&zØb?
ÞjÊ'i¹^ý©Ýþ'ò¢êܡ׬??)?wâ?+^?,"¶.µ¥?!;-jצz{ÿÊ?ÿ?Wkj
¨º°?¶?²IÞz)ç¢Ø¦yùZ·ò-þÈ(¡Ûh?æ«?úè?*.®h¬µ©þ+ÿ±·µêí¢W?®wë¢j-?êìÿðîsÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿN¬?¨¥?x%?Ëb²w¢¶«²?'²?Þvz+zwh®Ç?o"'½éìÊÃë¡Ç¬±,¬µé¬ýú+?êåÉ8^?[¢º¢jZ?/ÿRÇ?è§~?¨º?íj)áz·?·*.®?'®+$³ô^iØm¶?ÿÿ
0þØ^q«,jwkj?è?ç-þ?àýجrV¢?êÿ?Ù¥~?[¢º&j)b?
b²ßá¶Úÿÿü0Ã÷ëyéb²Ûÿ¢¸??+-ýú1n?è¶?.nÇ+?·ÿ?¨¥¶?ߣè®?ëz«?²ßßç¥?Ëlþ?àþË??ç-
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- From: Corey R Clingo
- Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- From: Duc M Do
- Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- From: Johnson, Alex P (IPS)
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- » Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- » Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- » Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- » Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- » Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- » Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- » Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- » Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- » Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- From: Corey R Clingo
- Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- From: Duc M Do
- Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
- From: Johnson, Alex P (IPS)