Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?

Corey,
There is no restriction on the number of IND blocks in a compound. The once was 
a 100+/- block limit, but that was removed long ago.

AJ


-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Corey R Clingo
Sent: Thu 9/25/2008 6:29 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
 
OK, I might be turning into an HLBL crackhead :)

I rolled my own rolling average program in an IND block the other day, and 
it's sooo much nicer for long average periods or fast scan times than 47 
CALCA blocks.  Maybe 20 actual lines of code (plus comments), and it 
executed fully in a BPC with no noticeable loading on a CP40B.  So 
naturally I get to thinking where else I could use this shiny new power 
tool...


I did it as an IND block, which was OK for my one application, but got to 
wondering if I should implement it also as a MON/DEP combination or 
something similar, so as not to hog up that compound's IND block slot 
(which might be doing something important, like sending out mass emails 
urging people to write in David Johnson for prez) with some chicken-poo 
little rolling average program.  I guess I could locate it in another 
compound, but that seems ugly.   As I was reading through the HLBL docs, 
though, I never saw any mention of the 1-IND-per-compound restriction I've 
heard for all these years, and so I wonder if that limit is still real?


Corey Clingo
BASF Corporation




 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 




* Confidentiality Notice:
This e-mail and any associated files are intended solely for the individual or 
entity to whom they are addressed. Please do not copy it or use it for any 
purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. Further, this e-mail 
and any associated files may be confidential and further may be legally 
privileged. This email is from the Invensys Process Systems business unit of 
Invensys plc which is a company registered in England and Wales with its 
registered office at Portland House, Bressenden Place, London, SW1E 5BF 
(Registered number 166023).  For a list of European legal entities within the 
Invensys Process Systems business group, please click here 
http://www.invensys.com/legal/default.asp?top_nav_idw&nav_id?&prev_idw.

If you have received this e-mail in error, you are on notice of its status. 
Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from 
your system. Thank you for your co-operation. You may contact our Helpdesk on 
+44 (0)20 7821 3859 / 2105 or email inet.hqhelpdesk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx This e-mail 
and any attachments thereto may be subject to the terms of any agreements 
between Invensys (and/or its subsidiaries and affiliates) and the recipient 
(and/or its subsidiaries and affiliates).


 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave

Other related posts: