Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?

From: "Jeremy Milum" <jmilum@xxxxxxxxx>
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 19:23:16 -0500

On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 6:29 PM, Corey R Clingo <corey.clingo@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> OK, I might be turning into an HLBL crackhead :)
>
> I rolled my own rolling average program in an IND block the other day, and
> it's sooo much nicer for long average periods or fast scan times

post your code or add it to the wiki. we really need to do am HLBL
best practices w/ coding examples and such.

_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html

foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave

References:

[foxboro] HART AOUT gives error in sysmon
From: David Johnson

[foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?
From: Corey R Clingo

Re: [foxboro] One IND block per compound -- still true?

Other related posts: