Re: [foxboro] OPC again...
- From: Corey R Clingo <corey.clingo@xxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:57:58 -0500
Personally, I would only use it in the manner Alex described: using a
watchdog in the CP with fallback logic and control. Doing control with
anything that requires Windows and DCOM makes me nervous, but if it's
supervisory (like APC), you can at least implement a secondary mechanism.
Most of the installation guides I've seen recommend opening things up wide
to ease getting DCOM working properly, which of course is derimental to
security. I have always taken that advice to heart, or avoided DCOM
entirely by putting client and server on the same box.
And I've always heard a persistent rumor that writing to the I/A via OPC
(not sure of the mechanism, maybe AIM*OPC?) was not a very high bandwidth
proposition, but again, this may either not be true, or not an issue
depending on the size of the APC.
Corey Clingo
BASF Corporation
"Joseph M. Riccardi" <Joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
04/30/2007 09:43 AM
Please respond to
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
<foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
[foxboro] OPC again...
Folks,
I have always wondered if OPC was not just intended to collect data, or is
it also considered a viable communication link for control? I now have a
vendor that wants to perform advanced process control from their PC-based
software to specific control loops on the Foxboro System via OPC? Read
measurement values, execute advanced control algorithms, write control
outputs, etc.
Is OPC considered secure, reliable, repeatable, etc. enough for control?
Your thoughts/recommendations?
Joseph M. Riccardi, Inc.
DCS Services - Industrial Process Control
North-Central Office (OH, PA, MI, IN, WV Area)
South-East Office (FL, GA, AL, SC, NC Area)
Joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
"To give real service you must add something that cannot be bought or
measured with money; and that is sincerity and integrity." - Donald A.
Adams
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] OPC again...
- From: Kevin_Fitzgerrell
- Re: [foxboro] OPC again...
- From: Johnson, Alex P \(IPS\)
- References:
- [foxboro] OPC again...
- From: Joseph M. Riccardi
Other related posts:
- Re: [foxboro] OPC again...
- From: Kevin_Fitzgerrell
- Re: [foxboro] OPC again...
- From: Johnson, Alex P \(IPS\)
- [foxboro] OPC again...
- From: Joseph M. Riccardi