Re: [foxboro] (No Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:25:42 -0600

Brian,
You show four sets of xxx's in your netmask file below but I'm not sure
whether you mean xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx or xxx.xxx.0.0.  In my file, the last tw=
o
numbers are zeros and it seems to work ok.  I have an AW-51B though.

My problem back in July turned out to be an le1 and le2 problem.  I thoug=
ht
I had an le2 but really it was an le1.  Somewhere in years past, maybe
during Y2K upgrade, the le2 was replaced with an le1 and I had forgotten
about that.  If I had not had a bad brain cramp that day, it would have
been obvious.

Cyrus Taft
EPRI I&C Center



Message text written by INTERNET:foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Duc
 I have the same in my netmask file.
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx   255.255.255.192

...But when you specified the different hostname.xxx for B/C and D boxes
below, it reminded me that I am using a AW51A.
Yes a 51A, an oldie but goody, still runs like a top, if you don't ask it=

to do too much.

I did get everything working, but I had to resort to a startup script.
...Maybe the network configuration is different on a 51A.
Next week I will try another box (AW51B).  Hopefully that one will work
without resorting to a script.
<

 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: