Re: [foxboro] More Process Summary Reporter Quirks

"Disabled" is inhibited when INHOPT=1 or 3 (i.e., alarm detection/flag 
generation is also disabled).  Exactly the opposite of the Honeywell I 
used to work on.  Foxboro's docs are not clear on this; I found it by 
accident.

As you said about PSR: the screenshots in the docs do not match my screen. 
 The Inhibited/Disabled pick that is in the screenshot is not present on 
my 6.5.3 system, or vive versa.  Can't remember exactly which.


Corey Clingo
BASF Corporation






"Loudermilk, Virgil:" <Virgil.Loudermilk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
10/21/2008 03:04 PM
Please respond to
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


To
<foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
[foxboro] More Process Summary Reporter Quirks






We noticed yet another quirk today in the PSR in that the documentation
(the latest I can find is B0193DG REV. E, fated June 30, 1999!) mentions
nothing about "Alarms Disabled ", which show up on our PSR screen right
under "Alarms Inhibited", but not on the screen print in the
documentation.  And reports using just the "Alarms Inhibited" choice do
not pick up all of the inhibited CIN blocks, but they apparently pick up
some newly built ones - very odd.  But also selecting "Alarms Disabled"
does cause it to pick up all inhibited CIN blocks.  As far as I know,
Foxboro only uses the term Inhibited alarm, not disabled alarm.  Does
anyone know what is going on here?
 
Thanks,
Virgil



 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave

Other related posts: