Re: [foxboro] Modbus Slave
- From: Kevin FitzGerrell <fitzgerrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:34:13 +1300
Ron
This is certainly feasible. You need a CP60 (or CP270), I/A version
should be V6.5.x, V7.1.x, or V8.0 and there are QFs out that apply
specifically to the FBM224 that should be applied.
Moving a gateway to the FBM224 means a new set of I/O blocks, a new
configurator, and using CP period/phase numbering instead of Gateway
period/phase.
You should confirm that the gateway itself is overloaded, not the modbus
coms link. If you're at the limit on your comms, an FBM224 may not help
much without adding additional comms lines (make use of more than one
port on the FBM) or higher baud rates. Also may be worth checking if
your fire and gas system supports Profibus comms, the FBM223 is
available and supports higher comms rates that serial modbus does.
Regards,
Kevin FitzGerrell
Carter Holt Harvey, Ltd.
+64 27 460 9994
Shuard, Ronald BSP-OPM/152 wrote:
> Hi Guy's,
>
> I have an MG30 talking to a fire and Gas system that is chronically =
> overloaded . I would like to investigate using a FBM224 to replace the =
> gateway. does anyone know if this is feasible and if so what version of =
> software do I need to be at.
>
> Thanks
> Ron Shuard
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Corey R Clingo
> Sent: 16 December 2005 03:08
> To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [foxboro] Modbus Slave
>
>
> We did this once to get two Honeywell systems to talk to each other. We =
>
> used a box called an Omnii-Comm, which can be a master/slave, in several =
>
> protocols, on up to 4 ports.
>
> Corey Clingo
> BASF Corp.
>
>
>
>
>
> "Joe Gale (MP)" <JGALE@xxxxxxxxxxx>=20
> Sent by: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 12/14/2005 09:47 AM
> Please respond to
> foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> To
> <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc
>
> Subject
> [foxboro] Modbus Slave
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I was wondering if there is a way to make a Modbus connection to Foxboro
> where Foxboro is the slave device? Reading through the FBM224
> documentation, it says that the gateway has to be the master. We want
> to be able to talk to a GE Harris D20 RTU and I am being told that they
> will only do it with the RTU as master. Anyone have a viable solution?
> Thanks,
>
> Joe Gale
> DCS Administrator
> Minnesota Power
> 1210 NW 3rd Street
> Cohasset, MN 55721
>
> 218-328-5036 x4611
> email:jgale@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> =20
> =20
> _______________________________________________________________________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
> =20
> foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe: =
> mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
> to unsubscribe: =
> mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
> =20
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
> foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] Modbus Slave
- From: Shuard, Ronald BSP-OPM/152
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] Modbus Slave
- » Re: [foxboro] Modbus Slave
- » Re: [foxboro] Modbus Slave
- » Re: [foxboro] Modbus Slave
- » Re: [foxboro] Modbus Slave
- » Re: [foxboro] Modbus Slave
- » Re: [foxboro] Modbus Slave
- » Re: [foxboro] Modbus Slave
- » Re: [foxboro] Modbus Slave
- » Re: [foxboro] Modbus Slave
- » Re: [foxboro] Modbus Slave
- » Re: [foxboro] Modbus Slave
- Re: [foxboro] Modbus Slave
- From: Shuard, Ronald BSP-OPM/152