Re: [foxboro] MESH Upgrade question
- From: "Kevin Fitzgerrell" <fitzgerrell@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:13:56 +0900
Do you have all your gateways on the same node?
No, I'm not having any problems obtaining GW30B modules now.
Regards,
Kevin FitzGerrell
On Dec 21, 2007 11:41 PM, Chaiket, Thom <tchaiket@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Under the original upgrade design, the host AW would sit on the MESH
> while the gateways are on the other side. According to Foxboro, the
> gateways cannot communicate with their host when they are rebooted. As
> to how they are being rebooted, I don't have an answer. =20
>
> We rejected the idea of keeping an AW as a host on the current network.
> For our application, it would imply having both the MESH and the
> carrierband network. It defeated the purpose of having an upgrade if
> that results in having to manage two networks. =20
>
> Are you having any difficulties obtaining the GW30B in general? =20
>
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] MESH Upgrade question
- From: Chaiket, Thom
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] MESH Upgrade question
- » Re: [foxboro] MESH Upgrade question
- » Re: [foxboro] MESH Upgrade question
- » Re: [foxboro] MESH Upgrade question
- » Re: [foxboro] MESH Upgrade question
- » Re: [foxboro] MESH Upgrade question
- » Re: [foxboro] MESH Upgrade question
- » Re: [foxboro] MESH Upgrade question
- » Re: [foxboro] MESH Upgrade question
- Re: [foxboro] MESH Upgrade question
- From: Chaiket, Thom