Re: [foxboro] Lock-up due to CSA server dying, QF1003660
- From: Duc M Do <duc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:33:25 -0500
Alex,
The description in that CAR1003660 describes pretty well the lock-up:
the screen (DM in our case) is frozen when the operators call up a
trend, any trend. And it takes 5-6 minutes before anything is pickable
on the screen again, or the graphic can be changed.
Yeah, I wouldn't think that the DM/FV would have any dependency on CSA,
either, but the symptoms are completely reproducible.
Duc
At 08:13 PM 2/16/06 -0500, Johnson, Alex P (IPS) wrote:
>
>Duc,
>
>I'm sure that you have explained this ad nauseam, but what "locked up"?
>
>Neither the DM nor FV are supposed to have CSA dependencies.
>
>Regards,
>
>Alex Johnson
>Invensys Systems, Inc.
>10900 Equity Drive
>Houston, TX 77041
>713.329.8472 (voice)
>713.329.1700 (fax)
>713.329.1600 (switchboard)
>alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>Behalf Of duc.do@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 3:30 PM
>To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [foxboro] Lock-up due to CSA server dying, QF1003660
>
>We recently experienced a problem with operator display stations locked
>up due to an untimely death of the CSA_SERVER process (twice, actually).
>There's a quick fix issued for a CAR for this condition, QF1003660
>(http://ips.csc.invensys.com/content/qfhtm/qf1003660.htm).
>
>The problem is, this QF is specifically for I/A v6.3 on Solaris.
>Somebody else asked whether this QF can be installed on a 6.4 system,
>and the answer was a guarded yes, with some hedging
>(http://ips.csc.invensys.com/content/CARs/CusCars/IACars/sqlCARs/1004205
>.htm).
>
>Our system is at v6.2.1 Solaris. Is there a comparable QF for this
>problem for 6.2.1 systems? I've searched the CSC web site, of course,
>but did not find what I needed to know.
>
>On another angle, the CSA server is running on our lone XP AW at I/A
>V7.0, and has been running without any problem for nearly two years. Now
>all of a sudden, the CSA_SERVER process died twice in two days. Well, it
>appeared to have died. In haste, we didn't check to see if the
>CSA_SERVER process was still running or not when all the lock-ups took
>place.
>
>I'd appreciate any information regarding this QF, or the CSA_SERVER
>process dying.
>
>Regards,
>
>Duc
>
>--=20
>Duc M. Do
>Carrollton Plant
>Dow Corning Corp.
>Carrollton, KY, US
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts: