Re: [foxboro] Locking / Disabling equipment
- From: "Ken Heywood" <kheywood@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 14:24:45 -0400
You cannot rely on the DCS to lockout devices. You must control the =
source of energy, whether that is electrical, pressure, hydraulic or =
other. In fact, you can't comply with OSHA requirements unless you use =
lockout/tagout on the energy source, not just the controller of the =
device.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: brad.s.wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx=20
> [mailto:brad.s.wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 2:12 PM
> To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [foxboro] Locking / Disabling equipment
>=20
>=20
> We're wrestling with the best way to lockout equipment=20
> operated by the DCS.
> Our policy states that the technician doing the work must=20
> ultimately be in
> sole control of the locking "device". The obvious (and=20
> advertised) method
> to prevent operation of a DCS-controlled device is via the=20
> block DISABLE
> parameter. However, anyone with access to SELECT (or any=20
> other way to get
> block default display) also has access to the DISABLE=20
> parameter. Our past
> practice has been to physically lock a motor starter,=20
> disconnect a valve
> air supply, remove a valve acruator, etc, rather than rely on=20
> the DCS for a
> secure lockout.
>=20
> I'd like to know how other users manage lock/tag/try for=20
> DCS-controlled
> equipment.
>=20
> Brad Wilson
> ExxonMobil Chemical Co
> Edison Synthetics Plant
> 732-321-6115
> 732-321-6177 fax
> Brad.S.Wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>=20
> =20
> =20
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by=20
> Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you=20
> obtain here at
> your own risks. Read=20
> http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
> =20
> foxboro mailing list: =20
> http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe: =20
> mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
> to unsubscribe: =20
> mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
> =20
>=20
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] Locking / Disabling equipment
- From: Jeremy Milum
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] Locking / Disabling equipment
- » Re: [foxboro] Locking / Disabling equipment
- » Re: [foxboro] Locking / Disabling equipment
- » Re: [foxboro] Locking / Disabling equipment
- » Re: [foxboro] Locking / Disabling equipment
- » Re: [foxboro] Locking / Disabling equipment
- » Re: [foxboro] Locking / Disabling equipment
- » Re: [foxboro] Locking / Disabling equipment
- » Re: [foxboro] Locking / Disabling equipment
- » Re: [foxboro] Locking / Disabling equipment
- Re: [foxboro] Locking / Disabling equipment
- From: Jeremy Milum