Re: [foxboro] Informix Historian vs AIM*
- From: "Bakke, Richard A" <rabakke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:04:41 -0800
Thanks, Alex. Two questions:
1. How is the ease-of-use of AIM* compared to Informix? My understanding
is that AIM* is capable of many things, but this unfortunately makes it complex
to wade through.
2. Does the AIM* have reduction groups? My understanding is that a
reporting application would need to do the reducing itself.
Rich Bakke
"Johnson, Alex (Foxboro)" wrote:
> Re: The only advantage to us that I know of would be that AIM allows changes
> while still running.
>
> Ouch!
>
> Here are a few other items:
>
> 1) Complete management of messages (Alarms, OAJ, SOE, Sequence Block, and
> SysMon) - recording, archiving, presentation of information (with
> AIM*Inform)
> 2) Much better archiving support
> 3) Much larger tag counts
> 4) Lower CPU consumption for reduction groups
> 5) OPC, ODBC, and OLE DB support
> 6) Growing suite of desktop applications
>
> I think the message support is one of the key features of AIM*.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Alex Johnson
> Invensys Systems, Inc.
> 10707 Haddington
> Houston, TX 77043
> 713.722.2859 (office)
> 713.722.2700 (switchboard)
> 713.932.0222 (fax)
> ajohnson@xxxxxxxxxxx
> For the latest information on ArchestrA, go to
> www.invensys.com/Archestra.html.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bakke, Richard A [mailto:rabakke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 3:35 PM
> To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [foxboro] Informix Historian vs AIM*
>
> Asking for opinions concerning Informix vs AIM* Historian on 50-series:
> Having AP20's through 51D's, we have always been using the Informix
> Historian. We use it for trending (legacy Display Manager) and for
> reporting (via reduction groups). Since this Informix Historian is also
> available at ver. 7 for the AW-51F we are planning to buy, is there a
> really good reason to switch to the AIM* Historian? The cost to us
> would be learning new software and having the custom report package
> interface re-written. The only advantage to us that I know of would be
> that AIM allows changes while still running.
>
> Thanks,
> Rich Bakke
> Longview Fibre Co.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
> foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
> foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
