Re: [foxboro] Informix Historian vs AIM*
- From: "Johnson, Alex (Foxboro)" <ajohnson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:44:28 -0500
Re: The only advantage to us that I know of would be that AIM allows changes
while still running.
Ouch!
Here are a few other items:
1) Complete management of messages (Alarms, OAJ, SOE, Sequence Block, and
SysMon) - recording, archiving, presentation of information (with
AIM*Inform)
2) Much better archiving support
3) Much larger tag counts
4) Lower CPU consumption for reduction groups
5) OPC, ODBC, and OLE DB support
6) Growing suite of desktop applications
I think the message support is one of the key features of AIM*.
Hope this helps.
Alex Johnson
Invensys Systems, Inc.
10707 Haddington
Houston, TX 77043
713.722.2859 (office)
713.722.2700 (switchboard)
713.932.0222 (fax)
ajohnson@xxxxxxxxxxx
For the latest information on ArchestrA, go to
www.invensys.com/Archestra.html.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bakke, Richard A [mailto:rabakke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 3:35 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [foxboro] Informix Historian vs AIM*
Asking for opinions concerning Informix vs AIM* Historian on 50-series:
Having AP20's through 51D's, we have always been using the Informix
Historian. We use it for trending (legacy Display Manager) and for
reporting (via reduction groups). Since this Informix Historian is also
available at ver. 7 for the AW-51F we are planning to buy, is there a
really good reason to switch to the AIM* Historian? The cost to us
would be learning new software and having the custom report package
interface re-written. The only advantage to us that I know of would be
that AIM allows changes while still running.
Thanks,
Rich Bakke
Longview Fibre Co.
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] Informix Historian vs AIM*
- From: Bakke, Richard A
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] Informix Historian vs AIM*
- » Re: [foxboro] Informix Historian vs AIM*
- » Re: [foxboro] Informix Historian vs AIM*
- » Re: [foxboro] Informix Historian vs AIM*
- » Re: [foxboro] Informix Historian vs AIM*
- » Re: [foxboro] Informix Historian vs AIM*
- » Re: [foxboro] Informix Historian vs AIM*
- » Re: [foxboro] Informix Historian vs AIM*
- » Re: [foxboro] Informix Historian vs AIM*
- » Re: [foxboro] Informix Historian vs AIM*
- » Re: [foxboro] Informix Historian vs AIM*
- » Re: [foxboro] Informix Historian vs AIM*
- » Re: [foxboro] Informix Historian vs AIM*
- Re: [foxboro] Informix Historian vs AIM*
- From: Bakke, Richard A