Re: [foxboro] I/O Bad Problem

Look at BADOPT in your AIN blocks.  You likely have BAD + HOR + LOR
Code 3
If you set BADOPT =3D 0 it will ignore HOR and LOR

Your digital inputs do not have HOR or LOR so that is likely why
You get more bad states for your Analog blocks.

Terry

-----Message d'origine-----
De=A0: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx =
[mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de prabhakar
Envoy=E9=A0: May 15, 2006 1:49 PM
=C0=A0: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc=A0: brad.s.wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Objet=A0: [foxboro] I/O Bad Problem

Dear All,

Can anyone tell me why do we face I/O Bad problem with Analog Inputs =
more=20
often than digital inputs. IS ther any option in Foxboro ICC for =
filtering=20
Cyan or I/O bad in DIgital inputs. Of course there is option for Analog=20
inputs

Do we hav to write a calca for avoiding this

rgds
Prabhakar
Instrumentation Engineer
Refinery,
RIL,India=20
=20
=20
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
=20
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         =
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
to unsubscribe:      =
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
=20
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave

Other related posts: