Re: [foxboro] INVALM issue on a CIN block -- solved
- From: "Kevin Fitzgerrell" <fitzgerrell@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:15:28 +0900
Hi Corey,
Yes, the DPIDA works well, and can run much faster than a CP's 0.1
BPC. Tuning and monitoring can be a bit challenging though. I wasn't
aware it was available on a 200 series FBM though.
There are a number of other very useful and under utilized blocks
available on the system, as well as some interesting ways to put them
together.
Cheers,
Kevin
On 8/22/08, Corey R Clingo <corey.clingo@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
> P.S. while digging through the docs, I found a couple other potentially
> useful blocks. Anyone ever used a DPIDA? It looks cool for high-speed
> loops, if it will work in any 200-series FBMs. Better for a handful of
> fast loops then making your entire CP 0.1 BPC.
>
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] INVALM issue on a CIN block
- From: Illingsworth, John
- Re: [foxboro] INVALM issue on a CIN block -- solved
- From: Corey R Clingo
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] INVALM issue on a CIN block -- solved
- » Re: [foxboro] INVALM issue on a CIN block -- solved
- » Re: [foxboro] INVALM issue on a CIN block -- solved
- » Re: [foxboro] INVALM issue on a CIN block -- solved
- » Re: [foxboro] INVALM issue on a CIN block -- solved
- » Re: [foxboro] INVALM issue on a CIN block -- solved
- Re: [foxboro] INVALM issue on a CIN block
- From: Illingsworth, John
- Re: [foxboro] INVALM issue on a CIN block -- solved
- From: Corey R Clingo