Re: [foxboro] IACC v2.1

On 5/3/06, Johnson, Alex P (IPS) <alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Feature                   ICC  IACC  Comment
> # of users per database    1    1

Why? I would think that Block level locking would be feasible and an
attarctive feature. This would be one improvement over ICC that I
would really like. All modern databases include row level locking for
tables, what is the underlying database technology that the IACC uses?
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave

Other related posts: