Re: [foxboro] I/A v 8 with Solaris 10
- From: "Weiss, Andreas" <Andreas.Weiss@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 01:17:37 -0500
Hi Kevin and Russ,
thanks a lot for that valuable information.
But I'm still a little bit irritated about the fact that we have thrown
our AW51C away, using now AW51G (P81) and their is "no" update path to
Solaris 10.
Solaris 10 and an I/A System that avoids it to manipulate the underlying
operating system would allow us to manage the systems in a better way.=20
Means a central system to do health check about all system using
standard solaris products and a lot things more ...
I'm ending with the idea that it would be better to use the old AW51C
and migrate directly to mesh instead the thing that we have done.
The way that Kevin and we seems to go is in my eyes to expensive. It
seems to be cheaper to jump over every second hardware update. That
requires another strategy regarding spare parts but thats not a problem
for big installations.
...
Regards,
Andreas
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] I/A v 8 with Solaris 10
- From: Kevin FitzGerrell
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] I/A v 8 with Solaris 10
- » Re: [foxboro] I/A v 8 with Solaris 10
- » Re: [foxboro] I/A v 8 with Solaris 10
- » Re: [foxboro] I/A v 8 with Solaris 10
- » Re: [foxboro] I/A v 8 with Solaris 10
- » Re: [foxboro] I/A v 8 with Solaris 10
- » Re: [foxboro] I/A v 8 with Solaris 10
- » Re: [foxboro] I/A v 8 with Solaris 10
- Re: [foxboro] I/A v 8 with Solaris 10
- From: Kevin FitzGerrell