Re: [foxboro] How does remote display manager choose teh size of it's widnow?
- From: "Blunier, Mark" <Mark.Blunier@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:01:13 -0600
RE: [foxboro] How does remote display manager choose teh size of = it's
widnow?
>-----Original Message-----
>From: stan [mailto:stanb@xxxxxxxx[1]]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 1:32 PM
>To: Foxboro List
>Subject: [foxboro] How does remote display = manager choose teh size of
>it's widnow?
>
>
>
>I'm trying to build a "proof of = concept" Linux box to
>demonstrate using it as an X
>terminal replacer for display manager.
>
>I've managed to get the Linux box to have almost = the same
>resolution as the Sun
>box (1152x89x vs 1152x900). My first attempt at = checking this
>out was just to log
>in and start a remote display manager. However = the window
>that got me was much
>smaller (about 600x600 if I remember = correctly).
If I recall correctly, the 'native' resolution for the = display
manager is 960x720. I set my display size up to = 960x750 so
there is room for a window manager (if I run = one).
>
>Anyone have any idea why this would be?
The dmcfg specifies if it starts up full, default, or = quarter
size.
>I recognize that in the long run I'll = be
>using xdm broadcast or something like that. Will = that solve
>this problem?
No.
Mark Blunier
Any opinions expressed in this message are not = necessarily those of the
company.
--- Links ---
1 3D"mailto:stanb@xxxxxxxx";
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
