Re: [foxboro] HART on I/A -- thoughts?
- From: "Doucet, Terrence" <tdoucet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:08:41 -0400
Dave,
FBM214 - group isolated
FBM215 - total isolation
FBM216 - redundant HART - group isolation
FBM218 - redundant HART - total isolation
For any installation that has group isolation you must ensure that the
potential (voltage) between any two channels never (as in 24 X 7 X 365)
exceeds some small voltage. The Foxboro PSS does not specify a voltage.
Other manufacturers do publish the voltage in their specification.
I have seen voltage limits from 0.25 V to 2.5 V from various
manufacturers, so the voltage is not high and that means it is difficult
for a user to ensure that the voltage is never exceeded.
If you run the transmitters in the 4-20 mA mode there is obviously an
A/D converter. The Foxboro PSS does not state whether there is an A/D
per channel or per group. I have seen products from various
manufacturers where a common A/D is used per group and if the voltage is
exceeded, the A/D shuts down and you lose all signals.
For these and other reasons, many users demand total isolation for all
input and output circuits. I happen to think it is worth the extra cost.
Terry Doucet, Eng.
So, is there an galvanically isolated HART input card? Cause, uhh, I
didn't realize that this was just group isolated, and that kind of
sucks. See I was hoping to avoid, "is usually only found to be
deficient at installation and is a pain to fix."
Just wondering.
David
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts: