Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds

From: Sascha Wildner <swildner@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:03:48 +0200

Jeff Hurt schrieb:
> For our compounds, we were considering having one compound for each type of 
> block (AIN, COUT, etc).

Just curious, what potential advantages do you see that this is taken 
into consideration?

Regards,

-- 
Sascha Wildner
erpicon Software Development GmbH
Neusser Str. 724-726
50737 Köln
Germany

Phone:  +49 221 9746089
Fax:    +49 221 9746099
Mobile: +49 174 9887655
eMail:  swildner@xxxxxxxxxx
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave

References:

[foxboro] Grouping for compounds
From: Jeff Hurt

Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds

Other related posts: