Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- From: "Schouten, Frits JF" <Frits.Schouten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:14:36 +1200
And even a Modbus gateway does not require grouping of the block types
in separate compounds.
I have AOUT, MCIN and MAIN blocks mixed in a compound with some CALC,
BLNALM, TIM and IND mixed in for good measure and all on a Modbus
gateway.
Cheers,
Frits Schouten.
NZSteel.
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Neil Martin
Sent: Thursday, 25 September 2008 4:43 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
I highly suggest that where applicable, that control blocks associated
with the controls for a piece of equipment (like a distillation column,
a
batch kettle, etc.) be grouped within the same COMPOUND. Where
practical,
blocks that are part of the same control strategy should be in the same
COMPOUND. Doing so will effect the block processing order, the ease of
configuring the block and monitoring the block in FoxSelect, and
numerous
other reasons. I believe Modbus gateways will require that Booleans be
grouped in a COMPOUND separate from reals, but unless there are
requirements to do so, don't separate Compounds by block type.
Neil Martin
Huntsman Performance Chemicals
Conroe & Dayton , TX.
Conroe ph) 936-760-6205
Dayton ph) 936-257-4212
pager) 936-522-0052
Jeff Hurt <thehurtman@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
09/24/2008 10:46 AM
Please respond to
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
[foxboro] Grouping for compounds
We are in the design phase for a new Foxboro I/A project. For our
compounds, we were considering having one compound for each type of
block
(AIN, COUT, etc). It seems that this is a break from the norm, grouping
by system. Any thoughts as to why grouping by block type would be a bad
idea?
Thanks,
Jeff
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information that is
confidential, legally privileged or proprietary. It is intended only for use
by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person
responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be advised
that you have received this message in error. Any dissemination, copying, use
or re-transmission of this message or attachment, or the disclosure of any
information therein, is strictly forbidden. BlueScope Steel Limited does not
represent or guarantee that this message or attachment is free of errors, virus
or interference.
If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately
and delete the message. Any views expressed in this email are not necessarily
the views of BlueScope Steel Limited.
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- From: Jeff Hurt
- Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- From: Neil Martin
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- » Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- » Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- » Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- » Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- » Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- » Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- » Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- » Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- » Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- » Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- » Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- » Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- » Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- From: Jeff Hurt
- Re: [foxboro] Grouping for compounds
- From: Neil Martin