Re: [foxboro] Group 8 corruption (was:CP60 Alarm Message)

I only found one, 1000579, and the plaintiff had a specific set of 
circumstances to make it happen.  It was scheduled to be corrected in I/A 
6.4.  Since both my systems are at 6.5.3, I guess I'm OK, unless they 
regress

Thanks for the input..


Corey Clingo
BASF Corporation






"Kevin Fitzgerrell" <fitzgerrell@xxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
03/19/2008 04:11 PM
Please respond to
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


To
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc

Subject
Re: [foxboro] Group 8 corruption (was:CP60 Alarm Message)





You could omget the parameter and see it had changed.  I don't
remember what it looked like in the station block, or the conditions
that caused it to be overwritten.

This was documented in a CAR, but with the new smarter search tools at
the ips site I can't find things as easily any more.

I believe the fix was noted in one of the control releases.

Sorry I can't be more specific - anyone else have more details?

Regards,

Kevin FitzGerrell

>



 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave

Other related posts: