Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?

On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 09:41:59AM -0500, Jeremy Milum wrote:
> On 7/14/05, "Bakker, Ren=E9" <rene.bakker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Why the decision was made to NOT let the P80 & P81 boxes be defined as a =
> WP
> > but ONLY as an AW, I do not know.
> 
> Oh, I think we can all guess why this was done ;)
> 
I'm at a loss, wnat to share your speculation?

-- 
U.S. Encouraged by Vietnam Vote - Officials Cite 83% Turnout Despite Vietcong 
Terror 
- New York Times 9/3/1967
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave

Other related posts: