Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?

From: stan <stanb@xxxxxxxxx>
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 09:53:14 -0400

On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 06:02:51PM -0500, Jeremy Milum wrote:
> Wow. Looks like the conspiracy theory was just bunk, but my Muse did
> manage to generate a bit of good traffic. I'm sorry if I annoyed
> anyone and will endeavor to remain ON TOPIC for a while.
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> 

Personaly, I think you raised a dead thread back to living! And I got lot's
good informtion, including what looks like a viable workaround for us.

_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html

foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave

References:

Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
From: Bruley, Peter

Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
From: Jeremy Milum

Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?

Other related posts: