Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?

From: stan <stanb@xxxxxxxxx>
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 16:15:07 -0400

On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 03:45:04PM -0400, Bruley, Peter wrote:
> I should further state that I have P81's running as WP's c/w GCIO/Ann.KB's
> on a mixed v6.x/v7.x system since Dec. without any issues. 
> 
> The only thing weird you need to do is choose "WP51F" in System Definition
> but other than that there is nothing different to do. The box gets committed
> and loads up just fine as a WP51 with all the proper software.
> 

Thanks!

Wish our field service people had been aware of this.
-- 
U.S. Encouraged by Vietnam Vote - Officials Cite 83% Turnout Despite Vietcong 
Terror 
- New York Times 9/3/1967
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave

References:

Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
From: Bruley, Peter

Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?

Other related posts: