Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- From: stan <stanb@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 15:07:25 -0400
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 11:21:14AM -0400, "Bakker, Ren?" wrote:
> Stan,
>
> What I suggested for the "mtime" process also applies to the "nfd" process.
> Same trick, same file.
>
Thanks, that is a thought.
--
U.S. Encouraged by Vietnam Vote - Officials Cite 83% Turnout Despite Vietcong
Terror
- New York Times 9/3/1967
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- From: "Bakker, René"
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- From: "Bakker, René"