Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- From: Kevin FitzGerrell <fitzgerrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 06:48:21 +1200
As I understand it, there is no such thing as an AW or WP licence now.
Instead, there are P79 and P81 workstations on which you can buy:
* only the visualization suite (making it a WP effectively)
* only the engineering and hosting (making it an AP effectively)
* both of the above (making it an AW)
I believe the AW/WP/AP concept exists only in sysdef now, rather than in
Foxboro marketing/sales.
Regards,
Kevin FitzGerrell
Carter Holt Harvey
+64 27 460 9994
Jeremy Milum wrote:
> On 7/8/05, stan <stanb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>It appears that the system configuration software will not allow us to
>>define "G" boxes as WP', only as AW's.
>
>
> If you have a license for the box as an AW, are you allowed to then=20
> use it as a WP?
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- From: stan
- Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- From: Jeremy Milum
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- From: stan
- Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- From: Jeremy Milum