Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- From: Jeremy Milum <jmilum@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:41:21 -0500
On 7/8/05, stan <stanb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It appears that the system configuration software will not allow us to
> define "G" boxes as WP', only as AW's.
If you have a license for the box as an AW, are you allowed to then=20
use it as a WP?
> 1. NFD issues on mixed nodes.
I'm not sure what this is
> 2, Master timekeeper issues. Having more thna on potential master
> timkeeper complicates synching the time to a ntp time source.
I don't see what the problem is here either.=20
Can you give us some more detail about these issues?
--=20
Patron saints in general are broadband connections to the Almighty
- Michelle Delio, Wired News
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- From: Kevin FitzGerrell
- References:
- [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- From: stan
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- From: Kevin FitzGerrell
- [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- From: stan