Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- From: "Bakker, René" <rene.bakker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 08:36:14 -0400
Stan,
You are correct. SysDef does NOT allow you to decalere a 51G (P80 as well as
P81) as a WP.
What do you mean by "NFD issues on mixed nodes"? Please clarify.
As far as the Master timekeeper issues are concerned the solution should be
simple: just comment out the execution of the /usr/fox/exten/mtime task in
the /usr/fox/exten/foxboro.local file and the box will behave like a WP in
that respect.
Why the decision was made to NOT let the P80 & P81 boxes be defined as a WP
but ONLY as an AW, I do not know. I would guess your sales rep can shed some
light on that.
Regards,
Rene Bakker - EMEATAC - Invensys Systems - Baarn - the Netherlands
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- From: Jeremy Milum
- Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- From: stan
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- » Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- From: Jeremy Milum
- Re: [foxboro] "G" boxes as WP's ?
- From: stan