Re: [foxboro] Foxwacth2?
- From: "Balmer, Robert D." <rbalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:21:07 -0700
Well this is interesting.. For myself I would be as happy as a pig invited
to a pig barbecue.
For one thing this would violate our new corporate IT/Process Technologies
rules. That might be something you need to ask your folks Stan.
Robert Balmer
Climax Molybdenum
-----Original Message-----
From: stan [mailto:stanb@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 12:17 PM
To: Foxboro List
Subject: [foxboro] Foxwacth2?
Our local Foxboro service guy was in here today, and asked for a copy of
/etc/hosts off of one of the machines in my zone> I asked curiously what he
needed this for, and he mumbled something about a new FoxWatch
configuration.
Knowing this had been done already in another persons zone, I went and
looked around I found the following in /etc/hosts:
#*****************************************************
# Start of IA Remote Plus Addresses
# created Fri Mar 30 14:38:41 GMT 2001
#*****************************************************
#
# The following host entries were created by the
# IA Remote Plus Software Install sub-system. Any
# additional entries should be placed AFTER the End
# delimiter.
#
151.128.8.123 fxwrtr
151.128.8.124 foxwatch2
151.128.8.125 foxwatch1
151.128.8.126 fxwsrvr
#
#*****************************************************
# End of IA Remote Plus Addresses
#*****************************************************
Being the curious sort, I tried telneting to the first one of thes:
AW0102# telnet 151.128.8.123
Trying 151.128.8.123...
Connected to 151.128.8.123.
Escape character is '^]'.
login:
Interesting, I asked the group leader in that zone if he knew what the
appropriate userid, and password to access this mysterious device was, he
said no.
I'm curious about how other people feel about a vendor putting equipment on
our (the customers) networks that we are not provided access to?
--
"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your
own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
This message (including attachments) is for the designated recipient only and
may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise confidential information. If
you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of
this e-mail is prohibited.
Este mensaje (incluyendo los archivos adjuntos) está dirigido sólo al receptor
señalado y puede contener información de carácter privilegiada, privada o
confidencial. Si usted no es el receptor señalado o bien ha recibido este
mensaje por error, por favor notifique inmediatamente al remitente y elimine el
mensaje original. Cualquier otro uso de este mensaje de correo electrónico está
prohibido.
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] Foxwacth2?
- From: Mark Dumond
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] Foxwacth2?
- » Re: [foxboro] Foxwacth2?
- » Re: [foxboro] Foxwacth2?
- Re: [foxboro] Foxwacth2?
- From: Mark Dumond