Re: [foxboro] Foxboro/Invensys pulls another good one.
- From: "Glen Bounds" <gbounds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:08:27 -0400
Resistance is FUTILE! Come over to the dark side - the Dark, Microsoft
side.
----- Original Message -----
From: "stan" <stanb@xxxxxxxx>
To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: [foxboro] Foxboro/Invensys pulls another good one.
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 11:34:28AM -0500, John Metsker wrote:
> > Alex and list,
> >
> > The answer to your #2 question is true. Upgrades to Foxview are now
> > "chargeable" upgrades because each new release is considered to contain
new
> > features. They are not considered to be maintenance release that are
freely
> > available.
> >
> > 2) We are charging for the upgrade from FV 99.2.1 to FV8?
> >
> > Neil,
> >
> > I believe, however, that a formal policy is in place that allows a
customer
> > who has experienced (and has documented) problems with V99.2.1 may
negotiate
> > with their local field service organization to also treat the V8.0
release
> > as a maintenance upgrade as well. (Though submitting CARs can be
feudal,
> > they can pay off in this case.) Good Luck.
> >
>
> In my case CARS are liekley to be futile. Although I must admit feudal is
> possible :-)
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
