Re: [foxboro] Foxboro/Invensys pulls another good one.

On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 01:33:51PM -0700, Bakke, Richard A wrote:
> 
> I am very unhappy with having to pay for FoxView version 8, which sounds like
> it might finally be a product worth using.  I have been thinking seriously
> about switching from DM to FoxView, as Foxboro has been urging us to do, but
> this will in all probability nix that idea.  Why would what is supposed to be
> the basic graphics package for the I/A be separated from the rest of the 
> basics
> of the system????  Are they not really trying to improve their image?  It's a
> shame (and bad publicity) that the Foxboro I/A graphics in our mill have to
> continue to look ancient compared to the Honeywell graphics in our mill....
> 

It makes little sense to pay for this "upgrade" , since Foxview has been 
declared to be a dead end, that Foxboro is giving up on.

-- 
"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety."
                                                -- Benjamin Franklin
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: