Re: [foxboro] Foxboro cluster FBC21
- From: "Ajay Tathgir" <atathgir@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 09:22:13 -0000
Hi!
We been using FBC 21's, FBC 02's and failure rate is certainly higher compared
to other I/A hardware except for FBM 07's.
And we got a installed base of around 46 of each of FBC 02 & FBC 21. 4-5
failures of FBC 21 & 6-7 of FBC 02. FBC 21 failures were high at time of
commissioning, but FBC 02 can fail any time. Add to it 2 failures of FBP 10.
How's the experience regarding FBM 07's. We have had 12+ failures and all while
running.
Regards
Ajay Tathgir
Reliance Industries Limited
Mumbai - India
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- [foxboro] Foxboro cluster FBC21
- From: Alex Ashley (TXU TI)
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] Foxboro cluster FBC21
- » Re: [foxboro] Foxboro cluster FBC21
- » Re: [foxboro] Foxboro cluster FBC21
- » Re: [foxboro] Foxboro cluster FBC21
- » Re: [foxboro] Foxboro cluster FBC21
- [foxboro] Foxboro cluster FBC21
- From: Alex Ashley (TXU TI)