Re: [foxboro] Foxboro I/A interface with PLC5/30's

Of course, Alex.

Version 6.3.
Two CP60s in a redundant pair.
One AW51D & 2 WP51D's
Unix platform.

Your info. is very helpful.

NB.



-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Johnson, Alex
(Foxboro)
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 4:08 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] Foxboro I/A interface with PLC5/30's


There are a number of approaches available, but it would help to know a
little about your I/A Series system, e.g., Version (see
/usr/fox/sp/lastinst/SYSLVL first line) and control types (any CP60s or
xCP270s?).
=20

=20

The options are:

=20

*         V6/7 style solutions:

o        DI30s - Serial interface to DH or DH+

o        Modbus FBM (FBM 224) - Serial modbus interface used with CP60 =
at
V6.5.1 or later (requires a Modbus card in the PLC)

o        AW-Integrator for A-B

o        AW-Integrator with OPC DA Client I/O Gate

*         V8 style solutions

o        Modbus Serial RTU Master FBM 230/231 - Serial Modbus I/F for =
use
with CP270s

o        Modbus TCP/IP FBM 232/233 - Ethernet Modbus TCP/IP I/F for use =
with
CP270s

o        OPC DA Client FBM 232/233 - OPC to the AB PLC

=20

=20

Hope this helps.

=20

=20

Regards,

=20

Alex Johnson

Invensys Process Systems

Invensys Systems, Inc.

10707 Haddington

Houston, TX 77043

713.722.2859 (voice)

713.722.2700 (switchboard)

713.932.0222 (fax)

ajohnson@xxxxxxxxxxx

=20

-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] =
On
Behalf Of Baptiste, Nigel
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 2:59 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [foxboro] Foxboro I/A interface with PLC5/30's

=20

=20

Hello list,

=20

Does anyone have experience interfacing I/A with AB PLC5/30's?

=20

I have to integrate the two for combustion control & burner management =
=3D

on a steam turbine generator unit.

=20

The combustion controls would be replaced with the I/A system but the =
=3D

budget does not permit the replacement of the PLC based BMS.

=20

Hence I'm seeking the best way to interface the two systems.

=20

Regards,

Nigel Baptiste.

=20

=20

_______________________________________________________________________

This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process

Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at

your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html

=20

foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro

to subscribe:         =
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin

to unsubscribe:      =
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave

=20



=20
=20
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
=20
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         =
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
to unsubscribe:      =
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
=20
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: