Re: [foxboro] Facilities for Mixed Systems
- From: "Johnson, Alex P \(IPS\)" <alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 10:16:22 -0400
Re: 4 - Remote ICC type configuration from any workstation
> I'm not sure what "ICC type" configuration means, but IACC and IEE user
> may load the corresponding client on any Windows workstation and
> configure any station those configurators support.
>> I meant any of the configurators: ICC, IACC, IEE. I would like for the
>> control configuration stuff to be accessible from any workstation on
>> the network. so that i do not have to have a dedicated engineering
>> station in each of the control rooms. there are lots of things that I
>> only fell comfortable changing in the actual control room with the
>> operators present. I currently have this with unix, but I think i
>> would lose it if we went to a windows IEE type system?
The IACC and IEE Clients may be run on any Windows machine natively. [Does
require software to be loaded.]
The IACC and IEE Clients may be accessed from any Windows machine using
Terminal Services if the host machine is a P91. [Does not require software to
be loaded.]
The IEE, IACC, and IEE Clients and may be accessed from Solaris 8 and Solaris
10 machines if certain software is loaded. Solaris 2.5.1 might still be
available as a platform for this software, but I haven't checked it out in a
long time. [This does require a purchase and an installation on the Solaris
machines.]
Of course, the above applies to most Windows applications as well. There are a
few exceptions - FoxPanels for example supports only one instance and that's on
the host box.
Where does this fail?
Thoughts
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Jeremy Milum
Sent: Sat 3/31/2007 8:27 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] Facilities for Mixed Systems
On 3/30/07, Johnson, Alex P (IPS) <alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Would implementation of rcp solve this issue?
> Would implementation of rsh solve this issue?
yes, (ssh would be proffered, but since the current unix boxes don't
come with it installed, that would not be backwards compatible for
people w/ older unix systems, although it can be installed)
> Re: 4 - Remote ICC type configuration from any workstation
> I'm not sure what "ICC type" configuration means, but IACC and IEE user
> may load the corresponding client on any Windows workstation and
> configure any station those configurators support.
I meant any of the configurators: ICC, IACC, IEE. I would like for the
control configuration stuff to be accessible from any workstation on
the network. so that i do not have to have a dedicated engineering
station in each of the control rooms. there are lots of things that I
only fell comfortable changing in the actual control room with the
operators present. I currently have this with unix, but I think i
would lose it if we went to a windows IEE type system?
> [That said, some people have used X-Windows to access the ICC from a
> Windows machine since it is an X-Windows application - one of the
> reasons we supply eXceed. Using that approach allows the ICC to be run
> from anywhere, but you get only one instance of it from any given AW
> which is a limitation.]
and that has spoiled me. I like being able to get the ICC from ANY station.
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachment(s) to
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the recipient(s) and may
contain confidential, privileged or proprietary information. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, delete all copies of
this message and any attachment(s). Any other use of the E-Mail by you is
prohibited.
-- No attachments (even text) are allowed --
-- Type: application/ms-tnef
-- File: winmail.dat
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] Facilities for Mixed Systems
- From: Corey R Clingo
- Re: [foxboro] Facilities for Mixed Systems
- From: Jeremy Milum
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] client server
- From: Jeremy Milum
- Re: [foxboro] client server
- From: Corey R Clingo
- Re: [foxboro] client server
- From: Jeremy Milum
- [foxboro] Facilities for Mixed Systems
- From: Johnson, Alex P \(IPS\)
- Re: [foxboro] Facilities for Mixed Systems
- From: Jeremy Milum
- Re: [foxboro] Facilities for Mixed Systems
- From: Johnson, Alex P \(IPS\)
- Re: [foxboro] Facilities for Mixed Systems
- From: Jeremy Milum
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] Facilities for Mixed Systems
- » Re: [foxboro] Facilities for Mixed Systems
- » Re: [foxboro] Facilities for Mixed Systems
- » Re: [foxboro] Facilities for Mixed Systems
- » Re: [foxboro] Facilities for Mixed Systems
- » Re: [foxboro] Facilities for Mixed Systems
- Re: [foxboro] Facilities for Mixed Systems
- From: Corey R Clingo
- Re: [foxboro] Facilities for Mixed Systems
- From: Jeremy Milum
- Re: [foxboro] client server
- From: Jeremy Milum
- Re: [foxboro] client server
- From: Corey R Clingo
- Re: [foxboro] client server
- From: Jeremy Milum
- [foxboro] Facilities for Mixed Systems
- From: Johnson, Alex P \(IPS\)
- Re: [foxboro] Facilities for Mixed Systems
- From: Jeremy Milum
- Re: [foxboro] Facilities for Mixed Systems
- From: Johnson, Alex P \(IPS\)
- Re: [foxboro] Facilities for Mixed Systems
- From: Jeremy Milum