Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- From: "Pulas, Philip" <ppulas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:39:59 -0700
On the I/A side (no matter how your PI tag is configured), your I/A
block does have to be configured a certain way to be able to receive
writes, otherwise it won't accept them. I don't know if this applies to
all blocks/parameters, but I do know that for an AIN block, IOMOPT must
be 2 to be able to write to the MEAS parameter. You cannot write to it
with an IOMOPT of 0 or 1.
You also cannot write to the AIN's MEAS parameter if it is connected to
another C:B.P with IOMOPT=3D2 or if it is being set by something else
already.
>> Of course each tag (C:B.P) is configured as read or write on a per
tag basis.
To clarify Jack's comment above, it is the PI tag that is configured as
read from or write to an I/A C:B.P for the OSI side.
Philip Pulas
Golden Eagle Refinery
Tesoro
Martinez, CA
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jack.Easley@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 10:19 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
None for OSI PI. It's either write enable or no write enable per
interface. Of course each tag (C:B.P) is configured as read or write on
a per tag basis.
Jack Easley
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Theobald, Martin
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 11:57 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
For systems that allow OSI PI (or even OPC DA/HDA Clients) to write back
to the I/A Series, what options are there for limiting which
Compound:Block.Parameters that can be written to?
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- From: Gregory A Hurwitt
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- From: Theobald, Martin
- Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- From: Jack.Easley
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- » Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- » Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- » Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- » Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- » Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- » Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- » Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- » Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- » Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- » Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- » Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- » Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- » Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- » Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- » Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- » Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- » Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- » Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- » Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- » Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- » Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- From: Gregory A Hurwitt
- Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- From: Theobald, Martin
- Re: [foxboro] FXBAIS vs PI OPC Interface
- From: Jack.Easley