Re: [foxboro] FW: parameter state at CP boot
- From: steve.shimp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:23:21 -0500
The problem is directly associated with batching operations, not continuous
control (AIN-PID-AOUT). My facility uses GDEV blocks for ON-OFF valves and
pumps, which leads to potentially undesirable valve and pump state when a
CP boots.
Steve Shimp
Maintenance & Systems Engineer
ExxonMobil Paulsboro Lube Plant
phone: 856.224.5059 cell: 609.820.8501 fax: 856.224.5030
email: steve.shimp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 01/30/2006 10:11:09 AM:
> Dirk,
>
> Are you using PID type blocks to AOUT to ECB and then to a valve?
>
> If you configure the FBM's ECB for fail safe, and you set the AOUT =
> PRIBLK true (1) then on recovery of a failure, either the field bus =
> fails or the CP reboots, your PID (I assume you set it to initialize in =
> Manual) will hold its output at whatever you selected for the ECB =
> failsafe value, regardless
> of the value for PID.OUT in your checkpoint file.
>
> If you have blocks between the PID and the AOUT, you need to back =
> propagate status bits so that you can still set AOUT.PRIBLK true.
>
> If you are talking about ON-OFF valves controlled by PLB, you need to do
=
> a lot of coding to make this happen, but it can be done.
>
> Regards,
>
> Terry
>
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] FW: parameter state at CP boot
- From: Doucet, Terrence
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] FW: parameter state at CP boot
- » Re: [foxboro] FW: parameter state at CP boot
- » Re: [foxboro] FW: parameter state at CP boot
- » Re: [foxboro] FW: parameter state at CP boot
- » Re: [foxboro] FW: parameter state at CP boot
- » Re: [foxboro] FW: parameter state at CP boot
- » Re: [foxboro] FW: parameter state at CP boot
- Re: [foxboro] FW: parameter state at CP boot
- From: Doucet, Terrence