Re: [foxboro] FSIM as a replacement for the AW70X

Its not a matter of technical ability, of course the integrated CP in a box 
could have been ported over to v8.

The reason is purely a marketing decision.

-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Jeremy Milum
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 9:52 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] FSIM as a replacement for the AW70X

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Hicks, Gaylon F <gfhicks@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> And yes, I agree that the demise of the AW70x was a huge step backwards.
> Foxboro/Invensys/IPS has decided to push FSIM as their off-line
> development system of choice in the post-8.x world.

Was there a technical reason that the AW70x 'virtual' CP feature did not make 
the leap to the version 8.x platform? You would think that with all the 
windowsy .Net archestra infusionation, things would be easier on that front.


_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems 
(formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. 
Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html

foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave

 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave

Other related posts: