Re: [foxboro] FOXAPI Configuration for Foxhistory Ver 2.0

The OM API does not supply a call to change the scan rate on the list. It
does provide a mechanism to add and delete individual points to a list. (The
CP's use this for peer-to-peer to minimize list usage.)


The FoxAPI designers were given the task of consolidating all FoxAPI user's
needs so that a given point could be used by multiple programs and yet
appear to the CP as having a single user. 


Previously, a single point would be sent from the same CP to the same AW
once for each user of the point. In large installations, this was a problem.


The designers of FoxAPI given the goals and the constraints decide to fix
the scan rate and add points the list.


Other designs are possible, e.g., a high speed list and a slow speed list
and points are put on one or the other depending on the rsr in the scopen
call, but that is kind of irrelevant at this point.


Regards,

Alex Johnson
Invensys
10707 Haddington
Houston, TX 77063
713.722.2859 (office)
713.722.2700 (switchboard)
713.932.0222 (fax)
ajohnson@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ajohnson@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
For the latest information on ArchestrA, go to
www.invensys.com/Archestra.html
<http://www.invensys.com/divisions/Archestra.html> .


        -----Original Message-----
        From:   stan [SMTP:stanb@xxxxxxxx]
        Sent:   Thursday, December 12, 2002 7:16 AM
        To:     foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        Subject:        Re: [foxboro] FOXAPI  Configuration for Foxhistory
Ver 2.0


        On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 04:24:18PM -0500, Johnson, Alex (Foxboro)
wrote:
        > 
        > As I said, fastest_rsr sets the scan rate for all points opened by
FoxAPI -
        > IP.21 uses FoxAPI.
        > 
        > 
        > The original AIS API allowed each data set to be opened with a
different
        > scan rate. FoxAPI maintains the same call, but ignores the read
scan rate
        > specification. The OM lists that implement the data set are all
opened with
        > fastest_rsr.
        > 

        I don't mean to sound critical here, but this apears to be a less
desirbale
        way to work than the original AIS desing. Could you clarify what the
        _advantage_ of not having indivisual scan rates for each data
consumer are?

        -- 
        "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety
deserve
        neither liberty nor safety."
                                                        -- Benjamin Franklin
         
         
        
_______________________________________________________________________
        This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys
Process
        Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here
at
        your own risks. Read
http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
         
        foxboro mailing list:
http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
        to subscribe:
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
        to unsubscribe:
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
         
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: