Re: [foxboro] FBM231 for Non-Redundant Modbus
- From: "The Automation Man" <automationman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:55:59 -0400
Dimitris,
No, you can not do this, but if you only have one 231, you can install it as
if you were using a pair. You would just have an alarm on all the time in
the SMDH for the missing 231.
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Dimitris Legakis
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 2:59 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [foxboro] FBM231 for Non-Redundant Modbus
Hello all,
Does anyone know whether i can use a single FBM231 at the place of an FBM230
for non-redundant modbus communication?
According to the manual when you are using a pair of FBM231 you insert one
ECB202 for both. When using an FBM230 you insert one ECB200 for each FBM.
Could FBM231 work with ECB200? has anyone tried this before?
regards,
Dimitris
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] ICCDRVR.tsk - GET script problem
- From: Ron Schafer
- [foxboro] FBM231 for Non-Redundant Modbus
- From: Dimitris Legakis
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] FBM231 for Non-Redundant Modbus
- » Re: [foxboro] FBM231 for Non-Redundant Modbus
- Re: [foxboro] ICCDRVR.tsk - GET script problem
- From: Ron Schafer
- [foxboro] FBM231 for Non-Redundant Modbus
- From: Dimitris Legakis