Re: [foxboro] FBM224-multiple slaves on one port
- From: "David Johnson" <davidrjohnson@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:14:49 -0500
Corey,
I know this doesn't answer the question, but are you using all 4 ports? We
have done a couple of these, but always set up a separate port for each
slave device. So far I haven't needed to talk to more than 3 through the
FBM.
Regards,
David
--
"For my next trick I'll need a volunteer."
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] FBM224-multiple slaves on one port
- From: Corey R Clingo
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] More questions on the evolution from UNIX to Windows
- From: Johnson, Alex P \(IPS\)
- [foxboro] FBM224-multiple slaves on one port
- From: Corey R Clingo
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] FBM224-multiple slaves on one port
- » Re: [foxboro] FBM224-multiple slaves on one port
- » Re: [foxboro] FBM224-multiple slaves on one port
- » Re: [foxboro] FBM224-multiple slaves on one port
- » Re: [foxboro] FBM224-multiple slaves on one port
- » Re: [foxboro] FBM224-multiple slaves on one port
- » Re: [foxboro] FBM224-multiple slaves on one port
- Re: [foxboro] FBM224-multiple slaves on one port
- From: Corey R Clingo
- Re: [foxboro] More questions on the evolution from UNIX to Windows
- From: Johnson, Alex P \(IPS\)
- [foxboro] FBM224-multiple slaves on one port
- From: Corey R Clingo