Re: [foxboro] FBM224 redundancy?
- From: Jeremy Milum <jmilum@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:11:13 -0600
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:26:10 -0500, Johnson, Alex (Foxboro)
<ajohnson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The FBM224 does not support it the way that the FDSI FBM does under a CP270
> However, you can build redundant configurations using more blocks and some
> clever cabling.
We are considering doing this, What exactly is entailed and how hard is this to
setup/maintain?
Jeremy
--
Patron saints in general are broadband connections to the Almighty
- Michelle Delio, Wired News
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] FBM224 redundancy?
- From: Johnson, Alex (Foxboro)
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] FBM224 redundancy?
- » Re: [foxboro] FBM224 redundancy?
- » Re: [foxboro] FBM224 redundancy?
- Re: [foxboro] FBM224 redundancy?
- From: Johnson, Alex (Foxboro)