Re: [foxboro] FBM211, 214, and 216 Software and Hardware Revision - UPDATE
- From: Corey R Clingo <clingoc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 10:10:10 -0600
Yeah, I don't know. First of all, our inputs did not appear to be
"frozen"; they just had a high bias. They still moved around. Second, if
the new software merely flags the I/O bad after one of these "noise
events" occurs, instead of making the card immune to the noise, that only
solves half the problem, and generates a new problem in callouts. But I
guess I'll try it and see.
<tom.vandewater@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
12/28/2005 07:13 AM
Please respond to
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
<foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
[foxboro] FBM211, 214, and 216 Software and Hardware Revision - UPDATE
Corey,
Hopefully your ship has come in and problems are resolved for
your FBM214/216's that had offset values. Let us all know if there are
any more issues after installing QF1007709.
Cheers,
Tom VandeWater
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- [foxboro] FBM211, 214, and 216 Software and Hardware Revision - UPDATE
- From: tom.vandewater
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] FBM211, 214, and 216 Software and Hardware Revision - UPDATE
- [foxboro] FBM211, 214, and 216 Software and Hardware Revision - UPDATE
- From: tom.vandewater