Re: [foxboro] FBM204 failed to be recognized by system
- From: "Jason.LJZ" <jason.ljz@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 08:31:51 +0300
I did the "delete and undelete" action and also the "delete and recreat"
action.
When I did this, the AIN and AOUT detail display went to blue and in
System Magager
the FBM went offline. After I set it to online again, the AIN and AOUT
detail display
went to normal but reading was in white on red and I/O bad message was
there.
Thanks.
于 2012-1-18 19:59, Dirk Pauwels 写道:
> Did you try delete and undelete?
> Did you try to delete the FBM in the CP60_ECB and create it again?
>
> If you created the FBM ECB's long time before you physically entered the fbms
> it might be necessary to re-create them
>
> Rgds,
>
> Dirk
> -----Original Message-----
> From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Jason.LJZ
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 2:49 PM
> To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [foxboro] FBM204 failed to be recognized by system
>
> I am sure we have set the
>
> IOMOPT = 1
> IOM_ID
> SCI=3/SCO=3
>
> etc. correctly.
>
> Thanks for your precious time and reply.
>
> 于 2012-1-18 16:29, Dirk Pauwels 写道:
>> Q1: If your FBM is online and on scan it should be ok I guess
>> Q2: not that I know off, we have plenty of them and can't remember we
>> had problems during install
>> Q3: Did you enter the IOM_ID and point nr?
>> IOMOPT = 1?
>> Did you enter the SCI=3/SCO=3?
>>
>> Rgds,
>> Dirk
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jason.LJZ
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:28 AM
>> To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [foxboro] FBM204 failed to be recognized by system
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I just ran into a problem: we need to add a FBM204 to our system, which is
>> I/A 7.0 with 4 pairs CP60 and six AW51/WP51(Sun Blade 150) stations.
>>
>> Before we added the FBM204, the system has no other FBM204 installed. We
>> added a ECB2 and configured it as HWTYPE=204, SWTYPE=2. AIN and AOUT were
>> added and configured.
>>
>> The status of ECB2 was ONLINE and ON_SCAN.
>>
>> The problem is when we checked the AIN and AOUT block, the AIN block was
>> indicated as BAD I/O even the transmitter outside worked normally. When we
>> set output of AOUT as 50%, no milliampere can be measured.
>>
>> We also added a FBM241C to our system, and it works fine once it was added.
>> The difference is there are FBM241C already used in system.
>>
>> My question is:
>>
>> 1. Does it matter that there are same type FBM already installed in system?
>> So the newly added modules can be recognized by system?
>>
>> 2. Is there any thing special about adding FBM204 to system?
>>
>> 3. What can I do to probably solve the problem?
>>
>> Thanks in advance for your precious time for reading this and any help is
>> appreciated.
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> _ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys
>> Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you
>> obtain here at your own risks. Read
>> http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>>
>> foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
>> to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
>> to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> _ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys
>> Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you
>> obtain here at your own risks. Read
>> http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>>
>> foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
>> to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
>> to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your
> own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
> foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
> foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
