Re: [foxboro] FBM09C

  • From: "Latheef, P.A." <latheef@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 18:02:44 -0500

Loyd,
Please refer to the attached notes from B0193AC. Since only each input pair
is non isolated with next pair, if we connect CS of alternate pairs then all
the four channels will be non isolated.



-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Loyd Greer
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 2:43 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [foxboro] FBM09C

Hello,
=20
I would like to know if there would be a problem connecting the 2 CS =
terminals together, on a common input pair, on an FBM09C ?  I've checked =
it out to see that it works.  I just don't want to cause any long term =
problems.=20

Loyd Greer
Great Lakes Chemical=20



_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html

foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave



-- No attachments (even text) are allowed --
-- Type: application/msword
-- File: FBM9c rules.doc


 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts:

  • » Re: [foxboro] FBM09C